4.8 Article

New science in plain sight: Citizen scientists lead to the discovery of optical structure in the upper atmosphere

期刊

SCIENCE ADVANCES
卷 4, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aaq0030

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [1344296, AGS-1737823]
  2. NASA [NNX17AL22G]
  3. Canadian Space Agency [CSA-1006482, CSA-10006508]
  4. Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) [FA9550-15-1-0179]
  5. Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) [ST/M001059/1]
  6. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences
  7. Directorate For Geosciences [1344296] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences
  9. Directorate For Geosciences [1737823] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/M001059/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. STFC [ST/M001059/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A glowing ribbon of purple light running east-west in the night sky has recently been observed by citizen scientists. This narrow, subauroral, visible structure, distinct from the traditional auroral oval, was largely undocumented in the scientific literature and little was known about its formation. Amateur photo sequences showed colors distinctly different from common types of aurora and occasionally indicated magnetic field-aligned substructures. Observations from the Swarm satellite as it crossed the arc have revealed an unusual level of electron temperature enhancement and density depletion, along with a strong westward ion flow, indicating that a pronounced subauroral ion drift (SAID) is associated with this structure. These early results suggest the arc is an optical manifestation of SAID, presenting new opportunities for investigation of the dynamic SAID signatures from the ground. On the basis of the measured ion properties and original citizen science name, we propose to identify this arc as a Strong Thermal Emission Velocity Enhancement (STEVE).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据