4.4 Article

Influence of capillarity and gravity on confined Faraday waves

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW FLUIDS
卷 3, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevFluids.3.073902

关键词

-

资金

  1. French Space Agency (CNES)
  2. European Space Agency (ESA) topical team Liquid interfaces subjected to oscillations,
  3. Marie Curie International Research Staff Exchange Scheme (IRSES) Fellowship [269207]
  4. NSF [0968313]
  5. NASA [NNX17AL27G]
  6. CASIS [GA-2015-218]
  7. Institute of Advanced Study, Durham University
  8. Office Of Internatl Science &Engineering
  9. Office Of The Director [968313] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Experiments characterizing the influence of gravity and interfacial tension on Faraday instability in immiscible, confined fluid layers are presented. The variation in interfacial tension was obtained by controlling the temperature of a suitable binary fluid pair while the influence of gravity was analyzed through a series of terrestrial and microgravity (parabolic flight) experiments. These experiments confirm the existence of a crossover frequency, on either side of which gravity plays opposing roles. The current experiments also reveal that the neutral stability curves under Earth's gravity drift toward lower frequencies as the temperature of the liquid pair approaches its upper consolutal value, i.e., the temperature of complete miscibility. Such drifts in the low frequency range are shown to occur primarily due to the reduction in density difference between the layers, whereas at very high frequencies they are controlled by the lowering of interfacial tension. In the absence of gravity, the Faraday waves are characterized by larger wave numbers, and, as in terrestrial conditions, the instability thresholds at high frequencies increase with an increase of temperature, i.e., reduction in interfacial tension value. This surprising stabilization originates from the lowering of the critical wavelength that leads to increased viscous dissipation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据