4.5 Article

Host-linked soil viral ecology along a permafrost thaw gradient

期刊

NATURE MICROBIOLOGY
卷 3, 期 8, 页码 870-880

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41564-018-0190-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research, under the Genomic Science program [DE-SC0004632, DE-SC0010580, DE-SC0016440]
  2. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (GBMF) [3305, 3790]
  3. US National Science Foundation (OCE) [1536989]
  4. European Research Council [336355]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Climate change threatens to release abundant carbon that is sequestered at high latitudes, but the constraints on microbial metabolisms that mediate the release of methane and carbon dioxide are poorly understood(1-7). The role of viruses, which are known to affect microbial dynamics, metabolism and biogeochemistry in the oceans(8-10), remains largely unexplored in soil. Here, we aimed to investigate how viruses influence microbial ecology and carbon metabolism in peatland soils along a permafrost thaw gradient in Sweden. We recovered 1,907 viral populations (genomes and large genome fragments) from 197 bulk soil and size-fractionated metagenomes, 58% of which were detected in metatranscriptomes and presumed to be active. In silico predictions linked 35% of the viruses to microbial host populations, highlighting likely viral predators of key carbon-cycling microorganisms, including methanogens and methanotrophs. Lineage-specific virus/host ratios varied, suggesting that viral infection dynamics may differentially impact microbial responses to a changing climate. Virus-encoded glycoside hydrolases, including an endomannanase with confirmed functional activity, indicated that viruses influence complex carbon degradation and that viral abundances were significant predictors of methane dynamics. These findings suggest that viruses may impact ecosystem function in climate-critical, terrestrial habitats and identify multiple potential viral contributions to soil carbon cycling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据