4.0 Article

Metabolic syndrome components are associated with oxidative stress in overweight and obese patients

期刊

ARCHIVES OF ENDOCRINOLOGY METABOLISM
卷 62, 期 3, 页码 309-318

出版社

SBEM-SOC BRASIL ENDOCRINOLOGIA & METABOLOGIA
DOI: 10.20945/2359-3997000000036

关键词

Overweight; obesity; metabolic syndrome; oxidative stress; nitrosative stress

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of the body mass index (BMI) and the metabolic syndrome (MetS) parameters on oxidative and nitrosative stress in overweight and obese subjects. Subjects and methods: Individuals were divided into three groups: the control group (G1, n = 131) with a BMI between 20 and 24.9 kg/m(2), the overweight group (G2, n = 120) with a BMI between 25 and 29.9 kg/m(2) and the obese group (G3, n = 79) with a BMI >= 30 kg/m(2). Results: G3 presented higher advanced oxidation protein products (AOPPs) in relation to G1 and G2 (p = 0.001 and p = 0.011, respectively) whereas G2 and G3 had lower levels of nitric oxide (NO) (p = 0.009 and p = 0.048, respectively) compared to G1. Adjusted for the presence of MetS to evaluate its influence, the levels of AOPPs did not differ between the groups, whereas NO remained significantly lower. Data adjusted by the BMI showed that subjects with higher triacylglycerol levels had higher AOPPs (p = 0.001) and decreased total radical-trapping antioxidant parameter/uric Acid (p = 0.036). Subjects with lower high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels and patients with higher blood pressure showed increased AOPPs (p = 0.001 and p = 0.034, respectively) and lower NO levels (p = 0.017 and p = 0.043, respectively). Subjects who presented insulin resistance had higher AOPPs (p = 0.024). Conclusions: Nitrosative stress was related to BMI, and protein oxidation and nitrosative stress were related to metabolic changes and hypertension. MetS components were essential participants in oxidative and nitrosative stress in overweight and obese subjects. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2018;62(3):309-18

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据