4.2 Article

Effects of Opuntia ficus-indica lectin on feeding, survival, and gut enzymes of maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais

期刊

APPLIED BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 61, 期 3, 页码 337-343

出版社

KOREAN SOC APPLIED BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1007/s13765-018-0363-7

关键词

Indian-fig; Lectin; Insecticidal activity; Greater rice weevil; Agricultural pest

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [446902/2014-4, 408789/2016-6]
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES) [AUXPE 1454/2013]
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Ciencia e Tecnologia do Estado de Pernambuco (FACEPE) [APQ-0137-2.08/12, APQ-0108-2.08/14, APQ-0661-2.08/15]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the effects of Opuntia ficus-indica lectin (OfiL) on the survival and nutritional parameters of Sitophilus zeamais (maize weevil) adults were evaluated. OfiL was incorporated into the artificial diets at concentrations of 15, 60, and 95 mg/g (mg of lectin per g of wheat flour). Mortality was evaluated after 7 and 15 days, and the amount of food ingested and the weight of the insects were determined on the 7th day. In addition, the in vitro effects of OfiL on the gut enzymes of the insect were investigated. The ingestion of OfiL did not show any significant difference in the mortality rates compared to control. The relative consumption rate was also similar to that of the control, and no deterrent effect was detected. However, the values of the relative biomass variation and the efficiency of ingested food conversion were negative in the treatments at 60 and 95 mg/g, showing that lectin ingestion resulted in weight loss. OfiL exhibited a stimulatory effect on the protease activity from S. zeamais gut extract, which may cause uncontrolled hydrolysis of proteins in the digestive tract. This lectin did not promote significant alteration in the amylase activity. In conclusion, OfiL was able to exert anti-nutritional effects without causing a deterrent effect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据