4.6 Article

Paper-Based Enzyme Competition Assay for Detecting Falsified β-Lactam Antibiotics

期刊

ACS SENSORS
卷 3, 期 7, 页码 1299-1307

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssensors.8b00163

关键词

falsified antibiotics; substandard antibiotics; beta-lactamase; nitrocefin; beta-lactam antibiotics; enzyme competition; microfluidic paper-based analytical devices

资金

  1. USDA through the USDA National Wildlife Research Center [16-7400-0589]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Falsified and substandard antibiotics are a growing worldwide problem that leads to increased patient mortality and decreased trust in healthcare, and contributes to antimicrobial resistance. Monitoring falsified antibiotics is difficult because most falsified pharmaceuticals are most commonly found in developing countries, where detecting the active ingredient is difficult due to lack of access to complex instrumentation. Herein, we describe the development and optimization of a microfluidic paper based analytical device (mu PAD) to detect the active ingredient in the most falsified class of antibiotics, beta-lactams. The assay is based on enzyme competition, making it the first demonstrated competitive enzyme assay reported in paper-based devices. The assay uses nitrocefin, a chromogenic substrate, to compete with beta-lactam antibiotics in a reaction with beta-lactamase. A yellow color indicates legitimate drugs, while a color change from yellow to red indicates falsified drugs. In addition to testing for the active ingredient, another section of the device was added to test the sample pH to further verify results and identify common falsified ingredients like aspirin or baking soda. Calibration curves for four different antibiotics, including cefazolin, have been generated making it the first paper-based device capable of detecting both cephalosporin and penicillin antibiotics. The mu PAD has also been tested with common falsified ingredients and four antibiotics in tablet or injectable form, demonstrating its potential for in -field falsified antibiotic testing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据