4.3 Article

Synthesis and characterisation of submicron silica particles from rice husk

期刊

GREEN MATERIALS
卷 6, 期 1, 页码 15-22

出版社

ICE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1680/jgrma.17.00019

关键词

cellulose; electron microscopy; material characterisation

资金

  1. Direccion de Investigaciones de la Sede Manizales (Hermes Project) Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Manizales [30955]
  2. Colciencias

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rice husk is considered an important silica source. In this work, microsilica particles were obtained by incineration of rice husk and milling of its ash. The synthesis process was carried out by incinerating the rice husk at 700 degrees C, followed by acid leaching in order to remove inorganic impurities and finally mechanical ball milling at 0, 18, 36 and 72 h to reduce the particle size. Thermogravimetric analysis shows the thermal degradation of rice husk and elimination of organic components. The chemical composition was studied by X-ray fluorescence. The structural properties of silica were determined by X-ray diffraction. The morphological changes caused by mechanical milling were studied by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The results indicate that between 150 and 450 degrees C, the organic material of the husk was released, and above 550 degrees C, ash with high silica content was obtained. Acid leaching increased the silica purity from 93.40 to 98.22%. According to the X-ray diffraction analysis, the predominant phase was silica. The reduction in the crystallinity of silica samples was shown as an effect of mechanical milling while the particle size was reduced. The percentage of crystallinity decreased from 33.5 to 28.5% for after 72 h of milling. The SEM images showed that the particle size reduced with an increase in milling time, obtaining particle diameters smaller than 2.0 mm. The amorphous silica obtained from rice husk can be used for the production of high-performance silicon, silicon carbide, silicon nitride, silicon tetrachloride and zeolites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据