4.7 Article

Market and behavior driven predictive energy management for residential buildings

期刊

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
卷 38, 期 -, 页码 723-735

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2018.01.030

关键词

Model predictive control (MPC); Building to grid integration; Building energy management system; Real time pricing; Occupant behavior

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) under Collaborative Research: Empowering Smart Energy Communities: Connecting Buildings, People, and Power Grids Award [1637249]
  2. Department of Energy (DOE) under Building-Grid Integration Research and Development Innovators Program (BIRD IP)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the advancement of smart home and grid, a more connected and efficient operation of the grid is achievable. Involving buildings as the largest consumer of electricity in such a smart operation is a critical step in achieving an interactive grid system. In this paper, a building energy management system is introduced considering electricity price and people behavior, controlling major consumers of electricity in a single family residential building. An air conditioner, water heater, electric vehicle, and battery storages are controlled in a photovoltaic (PV) equipped building. A model predictive control is designed to minimize the operation cost considering system model, electricity price and people behavior patterns in each device control. Centralized and stand-alone configuration of MPC for building energy management is formulated and were put in contrast for time of use pricing (TOU), hourly pricing and five minutes pricing. Simulation results show that in real time five minutes pricing these methods can achieve 20%-30% cost savings in different appliances, and 42% savings in overall electricity cost adding battery optimal control compared to traditional rule based control. Cost savings and peak shaving results demonstrate the capabilities of introduced price and behavior based control.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据