4.7 Article

Eco-efficiency measurement of coal-fired power plants in China using super efficiency data envelopment analysis

期刊

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
卷 36, 期 -, 页码 157-168

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2017.10.011

关键词

Coal-fired power plant; Eco-efficiency analysis; Super efficiency data envelopment analysis; External factors; Tobit regression

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [71271085]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2015XS27]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The measurement of coal-fired power plant eco-efficiency and identification of influencing variables are of great importance for the government to develop relative policy decisions. In this article, an improved two-stage analysis model is employed to analyze eco-efficiency of 58 Chinese coal-fired power plants: firstly, principal component analysis is selected for pre-treatment of variables in order to reduce dimensionality and distinguish prioritized factors; secondly, the super efficiency data envelopment analysis is chosen to assess eco-efficiency with overall ranking; thirdly, Kruskal-Wallis rank sum tests are adopted to figure out macro-environmental factors; finally, considering interactions in the coal power industry chain, plus time effect, we apply the Tobit regression to determine direct external factors. According to the result, over 60% of the coal-fired power plants work in an acceptable productive condition, while some still face improper investment problems. Plants with large installed capacity tend to stably operate. Then, macro-environmental factors like policy preference and economic situation can greatly affect local plants' performance, while resource distribution has few impacts because of the perfect transport condition. In addition, the increasing thermal coal price help improve eco-efficiency while the high power unit age and feed-in tariff do harm to production performance. Based on the analysis, this paper also proposes some effective suggestions for the government.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据