4.7 Article

Chemical composition, total phenolic content, antioxidant and antinutritional characterisation of exudate gums

期刊

FOOD BIOSCIENCE
卷 23, 期 -, 页码 67-74

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.fbio.2018.03.006

关键词

Apricot; Exudate; Antioxidant; Antinutritional; Tannin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Present study was conducted to determine the chemical composition, antioxidant potential and antinutritional factors in some plant gums that have been commercially used as additives in different food formulations. For this purpose, exudate gums were chosen which included commercially used acacia and karaya gum. The properties were compared with an underutilised gum exuded from apricot tree, called apricot gum. Monosaccharide composition and linkages in gum polysaccharides were studied using Electron spray ionization-mass spectrometry coupled with time-of-flight analyser (ESI-MS-TOF). The assay involves ionization of gum polysaccharides by passing their organic solution into electric field and converting them into a mist of charged droplets that are further analysed and detected using Time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Relative array of peaks elucidated the presence of glucosyl, galactosyl and a small proportion of uronic acid units in all gums. Spectral fragmentation distribution was bimodal with polydispersity values greater than or equal to two (M-w/M-n >= 2). In all the antioxidant assays, methanol and ethanol were separately used for extraction. Total phenolic content, ferrous ion chelating ability and reducing power of the gums varied from 0.44 to 1.25 mg GAE/g, 11.80-60.42% and 0.12-0.23 AAE/g, respectively. The DPPH radical scavenging ability (12.03-27.23%) and bile acid binding activity (40.98-46.60%) of the gums was also high. Presence of tannins (0.20-0.73 TAE/g), phytic acid (0.03-0.60 mg/g) and haemagglutinins (0.006-0.11 HU/mg protein) was observed at a very small concentration. On the other hand, the antinutritional factors like terpenoids, saponins and alkaloids were found completely absent.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据