4.5 Article

Surface Modification on Pd Nanostructures for Selective Styrene Oxidation with Molecular Oxygen

期刊

CHEMNANOMAT
卷 4, 期 5, 页码 467-471

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cnma.201800014

关键词

palladium; heterogeneous catalysis; oxidation; nanostructures; molecular oxygen activation

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFA0207301]
  2. NSFC [21725102, 21471141, U1532135, 21601173]
  3. CAS Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences [QYZDB-SSW-SLH018]
  4. CAS Interdisciplinary Innovation Team, Innovative Program of Development Foundation of Hefei Center for Physical Science and Technology [2016FXCX003]
  5. Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation [1608085QB24]
  6. Chinese Universities Scientific Fund [WK2310000067]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The catalytic oxidation based on molecular oxygen (O-2) is one of the most preferable choices for oxidation reactions toward atom-efficient utilization of oxidants, in which heterogeneous catalysts based on palladium (Pd) nanostructures have been commonly used. However, in terms of selective styrene oxidation, it is still a great challenge to balance reactivity and selectivity by employing pure Pd catalysts. Herein, a well-designed model for seeking a selective oxidation catalyst based on surface lattice engineering is described. In the proposed model, Au atoms are sparsely deposited on the surface of concave Pd nanostructures. As such, the activation degree of adsorbed O-2 can be altered by simply tailoring the concentration of Au atoms on surface, suppressing the formation of over-oxidized byproducts. Moreover, the Pd@Au nanostructures reported here have sufficient plasmonic cross-sections for light harvesting, which enables light-driven catalysis through a photothermal effect. Taken together, the Pd@Au-0.08 concave nanostructures with an Au/Pd ratio of 8% achieve 87% main product selectivity with a conversion of 44% in the aerobic oxidation of styrene using molecular O-2 (1 atm) without additional initiator.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据