4.6 Article

Investigation of Lightning Flash Locations in Isolated Convection Using LMA Observations

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES
卷 123, 期 11, 页码 6158-6174

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2017JD027569

关键词

lightning; microphysics; satellite detection; atmospheric chemistry

资金

  1. NOAA [NA14OAR4320125]
  2. NSF PDM [AGS-1429925]
  3. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences [1429925] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using Lightning Mapping Arrays (LMAs), lightning flash locations in three dimensions have been investigated using multiple methods. Approximately 500,000 flashes were analyzed to reveal the variability of lightning initiation and propagation within convective storms. These flashes were produced by over 4,000 isolated convective storms during one warm season across diverse weather regimes in northern Alabama, Washington, D.C., central Oklahoma, and northeastern Colorado. Lightning locations are analyzed within the context of radar reflectivities and examined for vertical variability. Results show that storms in Colorado preferentially produced flashes at lower altitudes and in regions of higher reflectivity compared to the other regions. The regional differences in flash altitudes are largely attributed to the prevalence of anomalous polarity storms (middle- or low-level dominant positive charge) in Colorado, as anomalous storms produced a majority of flashes at lower altitudes compared to storms with normal polarity charge structures (middle-level negative charge). Conversely, anomalous storms are exceedingly rare in the other regions of study. The differences in flash altitudes are coincident with discrepancies between annual average densities estimated by satellite observations and LMA. Specifically, large differences in annual average flash density estimates exist in northeastern Colorado, which are not present in the other regions, suggesting that the lower altitude flashes in Colorado may be more difficult to detect by satellites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据