4.6 Article

Spectral Characteristics of VLF Sferics Associated With RHESSI TGFs

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES
卷 123, 期 1, 页码 139-159

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2017JD027624

关键词

terrestrial gamma ray flash; TGF radio emissions; VLF sferics; Earth-ionosphere waveguide; EIWG propagation; IC leader

资金

  1. European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme/ERC [320839]
  2. Research Council of Norway [208028/F50, 223252/F50]
  3. NSF [ATM-1565606]
  4. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, MINECO [ESP2015-69909-C5-2-R, FIS2014-61774-EXP]
  5. [BES-2014-069567]
  6. Directorate For Geosciences
  7. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences [1565606] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We compared the modeled energy spectral density of very low frequency (VLF) radio emissions from terrestrial gamma ray flashes (TGFs) with the energy spectral density of VLF radio sferics recorded by Duke VLF receiver simultaneously with those TGFs. In total, six events with world wide lightning location network (WWLLN) defined locations were analyzed to exhibit a good fit between the modeled and observed energy spectral densities. In VLF range the energy spectral density of the TGF source current moment is found to be dominated by the contribution of secondary low-energy electrons and independent of the relativistic electrons which play their role in low-frequency (LF) range. Additional spectral modulation by the multiplicity of TGF peaks was found and demonstrated a good fit for two TGFs whose VLF sferics consist of two overlapping pulses each. The number of seeding pulses in TGF defines the spectral shape in VLF range, which allows to retrieve this number from VLF sferics, assuming they were radiated by TGFs. For two events it was found that the number of seeding pulses is small, of the order of 10. For the rest of the events the lower boundary of the number of seeding pulses was found to be between 10 to 10(3).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据