期刊
RESEARCH EVALUATION
卷 20, 期 3, 页码 239-246出版社
BEECH TREE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.3152/095820211X12941371876788
关键词
-
资金
- Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [0830387] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
Funding agencies and research councils around the world rely on peer review to assess the potential impacts of proposed research. This article compares the procedures of two major public science agencies - the US National Science Foundation and the European Commission's 7th Framework Programme - for evaluating ex ante the potential societal impact of research proposals. In this paper we survey the state of the art and discuss some of the conceptual questions that arise in using ex ante peer review to assess the societal impact of scientific research.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据