4.7 Article

A Searchable and Verifiable Data Protection Scheme for Scholarly Big Data

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TETC.2018.2830368

关键词

Cloud computing; Big Data; Protocols; Data models; Cryptography; Computers; Scholarly big data; security scheme; searchable encryption; data integrity; cloud computing

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61672295, 61672290, U1405254, 61772280]
  2. Guangxi Key Laboratory of Cryptography and Information Security [GCIS201715]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Information Security [2017-MS-10]
  4. CICAEET fund
  5. PAPD fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Scientific research achievements play a positive role in promoting social development, and the security of scholarly big data is crucial for protecting authors' reputation and copyright. This proposed scheme utilizes cloud computing technology to provide a trusted third-party-aided data protection solution, allowing users to verify data integrity and conduct encrypted keyword searches at any time.
Scientific research achievements play a positive role in the promotion of social development. Scholarly big data include scholars' scientific research, experimental data, and their own identity information. The security of scholarly big data relates to the authors' reputation and the copyright of their works. This paper proposes a trusted third-party-aided searchable and verifiable data protection scheme that utilizes cloud computing technology. For a better description of the the protocol, we first present a user-differentiated system model and a cube data storage structure. On the basis of the novel system model and data structure, the scheme helps the users review the integrity of their uploaded or downloaded data at any time and search the online scholarly data with encrypted keywords. The security analysis and performance simulation demonstrate that the novel scheme is a secure and efficient scheme for scholarly big data applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据