4.7 Article

SEARE: A System for Exercise Activity Recognition and Quality Evaluation Based on Green Sensing

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TETC.2018.2790080

关键词

Activity recognition; Wireless fidelity; Principal component analysis; Low pass filters; Feature extraction; Green sensing; WiFi; channel state information (CSI); exercise activity recognition; quality evaluation

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [61373137, 61572261, 61572260]
  2. Nature Science Foundation of Jiangsu for Distinguished Young Scientist [BK20170039]
  3. Research Innovation Program for College Graduates of Jiangsu Province [KYLX16_0666, KYLX16_0670]
  4. Scientific and Technological Support Project of Jiangsu Province [BE2016777]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Green-computing technology and energy-saving design have become the focus of research in various fields in recent years. As a ubiquitously deployed infrastructure, WiFi can be considered as a platform for green sensing, and a plethora of efforts have been made in WiFi-based passive detection recently. However, little work has been done on the exercise activity recognition. In this paper, we propose SEARE, a novel energy-efficient solution using WiFi for exercise activity recognition. It is prototyped by fine-grained CSI extracted from existing commercial WiFi devices. Different from traditional features like mean or max value exploited in previous activity recognition works, involving either time or frequency information, we select CSI-waveform shape as activity feature, which contains the information from both of these two domains. A series of de-noise methods are designed, including low-pass, PCA, and median filtering, where PCA can remove the in-band noise that traditional low-pass filters fail to do. Finally the evaluation of activities quality can be made. Extensive experimental result validates the great performance of SEARE in both LOS and NLOS scenarios, with average recognition accuracies of 97.8 and 91.2 percent respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据