4.5 Article

The impact of the lymph node density on overall survival in patients with Wilms' tumor: a SEER analysis

期刊

CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 671-677

出版社

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S163514

关键词

Wilms' tumor; lymph node density; overall survival

类别

资金

  1. National Social Science Foundation of China [16BGL183]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province [2015JM8415]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [2011jdhz55]
  4. Clinical Research Award of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University of China [XJTU1AF-CRF-2016-021]
  5. Research Fund of Health Bureau of Xi'an [QFO1330]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the impact of the lymph node density (LND) on overall survival of patients with Wilms' tumor (WT) using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Methods: Data from the SEER database were extracted from patients with WT in whom the LND could be obtained. Patients were divided into a low LND group and high LND group. Survival curves based on the LND stratification were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. The impact of prognostic factors on overall survival was analyzed using Cox regression models. Results: A total of 1,924 patients were identified from the database. Overall survival for the low LND group at 5, 10, and 20 years was significantly better than the high LND group (5-year survival: 94.1% vs 81.4%; 10-year survival: 92.6% vs 80.8%; 20-year survival: 90.6% vs 79.1%; P< 0.001). In multivariate analysis, LND was a significant predictor of overall survival, regardless of whether it was a categorical variable or a continuous variable. Other significant predictors included age, race, SEER stage, and tumor laterality. Conclusion: LND was a significant risk factor for overall survival of patients with WT. LND may provide a better prediction of the prognosis of WT patients and may be helpful for designing better treatments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据