4.7 Article

Extraction and evaluation of melt pool, plume and spatter information for powder-bed fusion AM process monitoring

期刊

MATERIALS & DESIGN
卷 156, 期 -, 页码 458-469

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.07.002

关键词

Additive manufacturing (AM); Powder-bed fusion; Melt pool, plume and spatter; Statistical process monitoring; Support vector machines (SVM); Convolutional neural network (CNN)

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council
  2. National University of Singapore
  3. National Additive Manufacturing Innovation Cluster, Singapore under a PEP project
  4. IDI Laser Services Pte Ltd., Singapore

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the continuous development of additive manufacturing technique, the issue on built quality has caught increasing attentions. To improve the quality of built parts, the process monitoring and control has been empha-sized as a promising solution. Despite a large number of studies on the development of sensors and instrumentations, the investigation on statistical analysis, modelling and automatic anomalies detection is still at an infant stage. To advance the related research, the intelligent classification methods, support vector machines (SVM) and convolutional neural network (CNN), were proposed for quality level identification in this work A vision system with high speed camera was used for process images acquisition. The features of different objects including melt pool, plume and spatter were extracted based on the AM process understanding. The corresponding feature vectors were used as the input for the SVM classification. The results indicated the information from different objects is sensitive to different types of quality anomalies. Moreover, the combination of features from these three objects can significantly improve the classification accuracy to 90.1%. Additionally, the comparison between SVM and CNN was also conducted, the high accuracy of 92.7% for the CNN model demonstrated that it is a promising method for quality level identification by using the vision system. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据