4.7 Article

Multi-structural network design and mechanical properties of graphene oxide filled chitosan-based hydrogel nanocomposites

期刊

MATERIALS & DESIGN
卷 148, 期 -, 页码 104-114

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.03.055

关键词

Chitosan; Graphene oxide; Hydrogel nanocomposites; Mechanical properties; Multi-structural network design

资金

  1. China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) [CUGL090223]
  2. National High-Tech R&D Program (863 program) for the 12th Five-Year Plan, Ministry of Science and Technology, PR China [SQ2010AA1000690005]
  3. Hubei Provincial Department of Education [XD2010037]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chitosan (CS), a linear natural polysaccharide, is often chosen to prepare hydrogels due to its hydrophilic nature and biocompatible merits. However, mechanically weak CS-based hydrogels show limited applications. Herein, we show a new multi-structural network design for mechanically enhancing graphene oxide (GO) filled CS-based hydrogel nanocomposites. The designedmulti-structural hydrogel network shows a relatively dense structure with surrounding polymer chains at the local zone of self-assembledGO-CS units and a relatively loose structure at the far zone, resulting in the mechanical enhancement. By tuning GO loading and molecular weight of CS in a specific range, we intend to understand the effect of the specific multiple network structures on the mechanical properties of the composites. The experimental results demonstrate that themulti-structural network design provides an effective reinforcement mechanism for the hydrogel composites. The composite (containing only 0.30 wt% GO and approximate to 90 wt% water) has achieved 163% and 91% increases in compressive strength and work of compression, respectively, comparing to those of the neat gel. The findings may be generally applicable for the structural design and understanding of nanofiller-reinforced hydrogel and elastomer composites. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据