4.7 Review

Anisotropy and heterogeneity of microstructure and mechanical properties in metal additive manufacturing: A critical review

期刊

MATERIALS & DESIGN
卷 139, 期 -, 页码 565-586

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.021

关键词

Additive manufacturing; Metals; Anisotropy; Heterogeneity; Microstructure; Properties

资金

  1. A*STAR Industrial Additive Manufacturing Program: Work Package 3 (Electron Beam Melting) [1325504103]
  2. Singapore Centre for 3D Printing
  3. National Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metal additive manufacturing (AM) has developed rapidly over the last decade to become a disruptive technology capable of revolutionizing the way that products from various industrial sectors such as biomedical, aerospace, automotive, marine and offshore are designed. Early adopters of the technology like the biomedical and aerospace industries have shown that the better-designed components offer substantial performance improvements over current designs. However, in-depth and comprehensive views on the microstructure and mechanical properties of additively manufactured metals and alloys are less reported. To realize the full design potential that metal AM can offer, especially for load-bearing structural components, it is imperative to provide a thorough understanding on the anisotropic and heterogeneous microstructure and mechanical properties that often occur within metal AM parts. This paper outlines a broad range of metal AM technologies and reviews literatures on the anisotropy and heterogeneity of microstructure and mechanical properties for metal AM parts. It can be highlighted that the contributing factors to the anisotropy and heterogeneity within metal AM parts were either their unique microstructural features or manufacturing deficiencies. Concluding remarks on the state-of-the-art research regarding this topic and the possible solutions to overcome the anisotropy and heterogeneity of metal AM parts are provided. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据