4.7 Article

Layered gelatin/PLLA scaffolds fabricated by electrospinning and 3D printing- for nasal cartilages and subchondral bone reconstruction

期刊

MATERIALS & DESIGN
卷 155, 期 -, 页码 297-306

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.06.012

关键词

3D printing; Electrospinning; Gelatin; Hydroxyapatite and collagen based drug; PLLA

资金

  1. National Science Centre, Poland in the frame of project: Layered scaffolds for nasal cartilages reconstruction fabricated by 3D printing and electrospinning [2015/18/E/ST5/00189]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present work the advantages of two kinds of different, well known and applicable, biomaterials (PLLA and gelatin) and twokinds of scaffold fabrication techniques (3D printing - FDMand electrospinning) were combined in order to create a novel multifunctional layered scaffold for nasal cartilages and subchondral bone reconstruction. The pore size of scaffolds produced by 3D printing technology was designed to solve the problem that oto-laryngologists currently have with fixing the nasal cartilage implant with needle and threads. The effect of the solution concentration for the electrospinning process on the microstructure and mechanical properties of gelatin nanofibers produced as well as the influence of drug concentration on the mechanical properties of membranes were investigated. The commercially available FDM - 3D printing system was used. 3D scaffolds varying in structure and geometry were designed and printed. The influence of the internal architecture of 3D printed scaffolds on their mechanical properties was tested. Hybrid layered scaffolds consisting of a top gelatin nanofibrous layer and a bottom 3D printed porous PLLA material were developed. The mineralization ability of a scaffold was determined in simulated body fluid. The cytotoxicity, proliferation and morphology of Murine fibroblasts L929 cultured on obtained biomaterials were evaluated. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据