4.7 Article

Buckling optimization of Kagome lattice cores with free-form trusses

期刊

MATERIALS & DESIGN
卷 145, 期 -, 页码 144-155

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.02.026

关键词

Additive manufacturing; Shape design; Buckling failure; Kagome lattice core; Free-form truss

资金

  1. National University of Singapore (NUS) scholarship
  2. Agency for Science, Technology and Research
  3. Science and Engineering Research Council of Singapore through the Additive Manufacturing Centre Initiative (SERC) [142 68 00088]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lightweight lattice structures are an important class of cellular structures with high potentials for multifunctional applications. Considering load-bearing requirements, truss buckling is one of the main failure mechanisms for low density and slender lattice structures. Critical buckling loads can be increased by modifying the profile of a truss. In this paper, we present a shape design method to optimize the critical buckling loads for lattice cores with free-form trusses. The free-form truss is represented by Fourier series and implicit surfaces, having smooth truss diameter variations and truss joints. The optimized truss profile is obtained by solving a parametric shape optimization problem with Fourier series coefficients as design variables. The method is used for designing optimized 1D columns and 3D Kagome lattice cores for sandwich panels. The numerical results predict 26.8% and 20.4% improvements of the critical buckling loads for 1D columns and 3D Kagome lattice cores compared to their uniform counterparts of the same mass, respectively. The optimized structures include complex smooth and curved geometries that are well suited for additive manufacturing because of the greater design freedom. Finally, the initial and optimized lattice cores are additively manufactured and tested. The experimental results validate the effectiveness of the proposed method. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据