4.7 Article

Titanium anodisation designed for surface colouration - Systemisation of parametric interaction using response surface methodology

期刊

MATERIALS & DESIGN
卷 139, 期 -, 页码 409-418

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.026

关键词

Anodic oxidation; Interference colour; Oxide thickness; Response surface; Titanium foil

资金

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi through engineering science cluster project [ESC0401]
  2. CSIR-Institute of Minerals and Materials Technology, Bhubaneswar [OLP55]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work statistically examines the influence of operating parameters on the thin oxide layer developed during titaniumanodisation and the complexity of parameter interactions on the surface colouration. The optimal parametric combinations for obtaining desired oxide thickness and interference colours are investigated. A three parametric Doehlert experimental designwas employed for the purpose. Reliable regressionmodelswere developed for oxide thickness (Tmeas), and colour specification viz., lightness (L*) and hue angle (h) with determination coefficients of 0.970, 0.988 and 0.998, respectively. The three chosen parameters namely operating voltage (V), electrolyte concentration (C), and operating temperature (T) were found to have significant interactions during anodisationwhich are analysed through a response surface. The oxide thicknesswas found to be influenced by all three parameters. It was additionally found to have multiple optimal parametric combinations for a desirable outcome because of the interactions; the lightness was found to be significantly affected by the interactions of electrolyte concentration and operating temperature; the expected periodicity in hue angle, as reported in literature, persisted amidst parameter interactions with mild variations to the trend. Furthermore, interdependencies were found among the developed regression models. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据