4.7 Article

Integration of physically-based and data-driven approaches for thermal field prediction in additive manufacturing

期刊

MATERIALS & DESIGN
卷 139, 期 -, 页码 473-485

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.028

关键词

Additive manufacturing; Thermal field; Geometry of freeform; Finite element modeling; Bayesian calibration

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CMMI-1436592]
  2. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  3. Directorate For Engineering [1436592] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A quantitative understanding of thermal field evolution is vital for quality control in additive manufacturing (AM). Because of the unknown material parameters, high computational costs, and imperfect understanding of the underlying science, physically-based approaches alone are insufficient for component-scale thermal field prediction. Here, we present a new framework that integrates physically-based and data-driven approaches with quasi in situ thermal imaging to address this problem. The framework consists of (i) thermal modeling using 3D finite element analysis (FEA), (ii) surrogate modeling using functional Gaussian process, and (iii) Bayesian calibration based on the thermal imaging data. According to heat transfer laws, we first investigate the transient thermal behavior during AM using 3D FEA. A functional Gaussian process-based surrogate model is then constructed to reduce the computational costs fromthe high-fidelity, physically-based model. Wefinally employ a Bayesian calibration method, which compares the surrogate modeling results and thermal measurements, to enable layer-to-layer thermal field prediction across the whole component. A case study on fused deposition modeling is conducted for components with 7 to 16 layers. The cross-validation results show that the proposed framework allows for accurate and fast thermal field prediction for components with different process settings and geometric designs. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据