4.7 Article

In situ measurements of layer roughness during laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing using low coherence scanning interferometry

期刊

MATERIALS & DESIGN
卷 154, 期 -, 页码 347-359

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.050

关键词

Additive manufacturing; Laser powder bed fusion; Selective laser melting; In situ process monitoring; Optical coherence tomography; Interferometry

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - Office of Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) [DE-AC52-07NA27344, 15-ERD-037, 18-SI-003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Layer-to-layer height measurements of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel using high speed spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) are presented. Layers are built up using an open architecture laser powder bed fusion machine while height measurements are made in-line along the process laser path following each layer print. Printed cubes, with and without an internal 'overhang' channel, were built to investigate the effect of scanning parameters on surface structure. Layer-to-layer scan rotation strategy significantly impacts surface roughness between layers which in turn can influence porosity. Spatter particles, which have been correlated with numerous defect modalities, generate high points in the powder bed and can persist on a melted surface for many layers. Laser power significantly affects overhang morphology, as measured by SD-OCT. Large dross occurs in the high energy density regime, while balling and a capillary-driven coalescence of unstable melt pools perpendicular to the scanning direction occurs in the low energy density regime. High fidelity powder-scale simulations of deep powder layers were used to further elucidate the underlying physics revealed by SD-OCT measurements and high speed imaging, yielding insight to defect formation mechanisms which can lead to improved process parameters. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据