4.7 Article

Performance of biocompatible PEEK processed by fused deposition additive manufacturing

期刊

MATERIALS & DESIGN
卷 146, 期 -, 页码 249-259

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.03.015

关键词

Additive manufacturing; Fused filament fabrication (FFF); Biocompatible PEEK; Fracture toughness; Interfacial bonding; Fused deposition modeling (FDM)

资金

  1. Abu Dhabi Education Council (ADEC) through the ADEC Award for Research Excellence (A2RE) [EX2016-000006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the tensile, flexural and fracture behavior of PEEK processed by fused filament fabrication (FFF) is reported. Three different configurations, viz., specimens built horizontally with a raster angle of 0 degrees (H-0 degrees) and 90 degrees (H-90 degrees), and vertically with a raster angle of 90 degrees (V-90 degrees) are examined. The best performing specimen in terms of its tensile, flexural and fracture toughness properties is H-0 degrees, followed by H-90 degrees and V-90 degrees. The H-0 degrees and H-90 degrees specimens exhibit 85% and 75% of tensile and flexural strengths of molded bulk PEEK, respectively. The fracture toughnesses of the H-0 degrees and H-90 degrees specimens are 78% and 70% of molded bulk PEEK, respectively. However, V-90 degrees specimens show lower tensile, flexural and fracture toughness properties compared to those of H-0 degrees, H-90 degrees and molded PEEK. The fracture surface and microtomography analyses indicate that the degree of interfacial bonding between beads during layer-by-layer buildup, is affected by the thermal gradient across the beads. The PEEK specimen configurations examined here have different thermal gradient in the build directions and such variations manifest themselves in their macroscopic mechanical behavior. The findings of this study provide guidelines for FFF of PEEK to enable its realization in applications such as orthopedic implants. (c) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据