4.7 Article Data Paper

Novel sequences, structural variations and gene presence variations of Asian cultivated rice

期刊

SCIENTIFIC DATA
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2018.79

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key RD Program [2016YFD0100904]
  2. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Project [OPPGD1393, OPP1130530]
  3. CAAS Innovative Team Award
  4. National High Technology Research and the International S&T Cooperation Program of China [2012DFB32280]
  5. 863 Program [2014AA10A601, 2014AA10A602-4]
  6. Shenzhen Peacock Plan
  7. Shenzhen Municipal Government of China
  8. National Key Technology Support Program [2015BAD01B02]
  9. Fundamental Research Funds for Central Non-Profit of Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences [Y2017CG21]
  10. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31501291]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genomic diversity within a species genome is the genetic basis of its phenotypic diversity essential for its adaptation to environments. The big picture of the total genetic diversity within Asian cultivated rice has been uncovered since the sequencing of 3,000 rice genomes, including the SNP data publicly available in the SNP-Seek database. Here we report other aspects of the genetic diversity, including rice sequences assembled from over 3,000 accessions but absent in the Nipponbare reference genome, structural variations (SVs) and gene presence/ absence variations (PAVs) in 453 accessions with sequencing depth over 20x. Using either SVs or gene PAVs, we were able to reconstruct the population structure of O. sativa, which was consistent with previous result based on SNPs. Moreover, we demonstrated the usefulness of the new data sets by successfully detecting the strong association of the Green Revolution gene, sd1, with plant height. Our data provide a more comprehensive view of the genetic diversity within rice, as well as additional genomic resources for research in rice breeding and plant biology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据