4.5 Article

Vitamin K antagonist use and renal function in pre-dialysis patients

期刊

CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 623-630

出版社

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/CLEP.S154719

关键词

coumarins; epidemiology; chronic kidney disease; glomerular filtration rate

资金

  1. Dutch Kidney Foundation [SB 110]
  2. Amgen
  3. Baxter

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: A post hoc analysis of a recent trial on direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists showed that amongst patients with mildly decreased kidney function, use of vitamin K antagonists was associated with a greater decline in renal function than use of direct oral anticoagulants. Whether these vitamin K antagonist effects are the same in pre-dialysis patients is unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the association between vitamin K antagonist use and the rate of renal function decline and time until start of dialysis in incident pre-dialysis patients. Methods: Data from 984 patients from the PREdialysis PAtient REcord study, a multicenter follow-up study of patients with chronic kidney disease who started pre-dialysis care in the Netherlands (1999-2011), were analyzed. Of these patients, 101 used a vitamin K antagonist. Linear mixed models were used to compare renal function decline between vitamin K antagonist users and non-users. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the HR with 95% CI for starting dialysis. Results: Vitamin K antagonist use was associated with an extra change in renal function of -0.09 (95% CI -1.32 to 1.13) mL/min/1.73 m(2) per year after adjustment for confounding. The adjusted HR for the start of dialysis was 1.20 (95% CI 0.85 to 1.69) in vitamin K antagonist users, compared to non-users. Conclusion: In incident pre-dialysis patients, the use of vitamin K antagonists was not associated with an accelerated kidney function decline or an earlier start of dialysis compared to non-use. The lack of knowledge on the indication for vitamin K antagonist use could lead to confounding by indication.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据