4.8 Article

Microservices Scheduling Model Over Heterogeneous Cloud-Edge Environments As Support for IoT Applications

期刊

IEEE INTERNET OF THINGS JOURNAL
卷 5, 期 4, 页码 2672-2681

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2792940

关键词

Cloud computing; edge computing; energy efficiency; heterogeneous systems; microservice scheduling.

资金

  1. MONROE-Toff Project (H2020) [644399]
  2. NETIO-ForestMon [53/05.09.2016, SMIS2014+105976]
  3. SPERO [PN-III-P2-2.1-SOL-2016-03-0046, 3Sol/2017]
  4. ROBIN [PN-III-P1-1.2-PCCDI-2017-0734]
  5. Basic Science Research Program through National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [2017R1A6A1A03015496]
  6. National Research Foundation of Korea [2017R1A6A1A03015496] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Motivated by the high-interest in increasing the utilization of nongeneral purpose devices in reaching computational objectives with a reduced cost, we propose a new model for scheduling microservices over heterogeneous cloud- edge environments. Our model uses a particular mathematical formulation for describing an architecture that includes heterogeneous machines that can handle different microservices. Since any new model asks for an early risk-analysis of the solution, we improved the CloudSim simulation framework to be suitable for an experiment that includes that kind of systems. In this paper, we discuss two examples of real-life utilizations of our proposed scheduling architecture. For an objective appreciation of the first example, we also include some experimental results based on the developed simulation tool. As a result of our interpretation of the experimental results we find out that some very simple scheduling algorithms may outperform some others in given situations that are frequently present in cloud-edge environments when we are using a microservice-oriented approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据