4.6 Article

Enhancing photocatalytic performance by constructing ultrafine TiO2 nanorods/g-C3N4 nanosheets heterojunction for water treatment

期刊

SCIENCE BULLETIN
卷 63, 期 11, 页码 683-690

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scib.2018.04.002

关键词

Heterojunction; Photocatalyst; TiO2 nanorods; g-C3N4 nanosheets; Water treatment

资金

  1. Beijing Municipal High Level Innovative Team Building Program [IDHT20180504]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21671011]
  3. Beijing High Talent Program
  4. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [KZ201710005002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Photocatalysis is considered to be a clean, green and efficient method to purify water. In this report, we first developed a highly efficient ultrafine TiO2 nanorods/g-C3N4 nanosheets (TiO2 NR/CN NS) composites via a simple hydrothermal method. Tiny TiO2 nanorods (diameter: similar to 1.5 nm and length: similar to 8.3 nm) were first loaded in situ on the CN NS by adding graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) to the reaction solution. The TiO2 NR/CN NS composites present high charge separation efficiency and broader light absorbance than P25 TiO2. Furthermore, we illustrate that the TiO2 NR/CN NS catalyst possesses high performance for the photocatalytic degradation of the common and stubborn pollutants in water, such as the rhodamine B (RhB) dye and phenol. Under visible light (lambda > 420 nm) irradiation, the apparent rate of the TiO2 NR/CN NR is 172 and 41 times higher than that of the P25 TiO2 and TiO2 NR, respectively. Additionally, we speculated that the heterojunction formed between TiO2 NR and CN NS, which is the basis for the experiments we have designed and the corresponding results. We demonstrated that reactive oxidative species such as superoxide anion radical and holes play critical roles in the degradation, and the hydroxyl radical contributes nothing to the degradation. (C) 2018 Science China Press. Published by Elsevier B.V. and Science China Press. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据