4.7 Article

Regulation of the mechanism of Type-II NADH: Quinone oxidoreductase from S. aureus

期刊

REDOX BIOLOGY
卷 16, 期 -, 页码 209-214

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2018.02.004

关键词

FAD; Respiratory chain; Flavoprotein; Electron transfer; Bacterial respiration; Kinetics

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [PD/BD/113985/2015, PD/BD/128213/2016, PD/00133/2012, IF/01507/2015]
  2. FEDER [LISBOA-01-0145-FEDER-007660]
  3. FCT - Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia
  4. national funds through FCT - Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia
  5. FCT, Portugal [UID/MULTI/04046/2013]
  6. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PD/BD/128213/2016, PD/BD/113985/2015] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Type-II NADH:quinone oxidoreductases (NDH-2s) are membrane proteins involved in respiratory chains and the only enzymes with NADH:quinone oxidoreductase activity expressed in Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), one of the most common causes of clinical infections. NDH-2s are members of the two-Dinucleotide Binding Domains Flavoprotein (tDBDF) superfamily, having a flavin adenine dinucleotide, FAD, as prosthetic group and NAD(P)H as substrate. The establishment of a Charge-Transfer Complex (CTC) between the isoalloxazine ring of the reduced flavin and the nicotinamide ring of NAD + in NDH-2 was described, and in this work we explored its role in the kinetic mechanism using different electron donors and electron acceptors. We observed that CTC slows down the rate of the second half reaction (quinone reduction) and determines the effect of HQNO, an inhibitor. Also, protonation equilibrium simulations clearly indicate that the protonation probability of an important residue for proton transfer to the active site (D302) is influenced by the presence of the CTC. We propose that CTC is critical for the overall mechanism of NDH-2 and possibly relevant to keep a low quinol/quinone ratio and avoid excessive ROS production in vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据