4.7 Review

Developing the next generation of graphene-based platforms for cancer therapeutics: The potential role of reactive oxygen species

期刊

REDOX BIOLOGY
卷 15, 期 -, 页码 34-40

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2017.11.018

关键词

Graphene; Reactive oxygen species; Singlet oxygen; Theranostics; Photodynamic therapy; Bioimaging

资金

  1. EPSRC CDT in Metamaterials University of Exeter, United Kingdom [EP/L015331/1 G930207]
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [1636743] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Graphene has a promising future in applications such as disease diagnosis, cancer therapy, drug/gene delivery, bio-imaging and antibacterial approaches owing to graphene's unique physical, chemical and mechanical properties alongside minimal toxicity to normal cells, and photo-stability. However, these unique features and bioavailability of graphene are fraught with uncertainties and concerns for environmental and occupational exposure. Changes in the physicochemical properties of graphene affect biological responses including reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. Lower production of ROS by currently available theranostic agents, e.g. magnetic nanoparticles, carbon nanotubes, gold nanostructures or polymeric nanoparticles, restricts their clinical application in cancer therapy. Oxidative stress induced by graphene accumulated in living organs is due to acellular factors which may affect physiological interactions between graphene and target tissues and cells. Acellular factors include particle size, shape, surface charge, surface containing functional groups, and light activation. Cellular responses such as mitochondrial respiration, graphene-cell interactions and pH of the medium are also determinants of ROS production. The mechanisms of ROS production by graphene and the role of ROS for cancer treatment, are poorly understood. The aim of this review is to set the theoretical basis for further research in developing graphene-based theranostic platforms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据