4.4 Article

Improved decomposition-based multi-objective cuckoo search algorithm for spectrum allocation in cognitive vehicular network

期刊

PHYSICAL COMMUNICATION
卷 34, 期 -, 页码 301-309

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.phycom.2018.06.003

关键词

Cuckoo search algorithm; Cognitive vehicular networks; Spectrum allocation; Multi-objective optimization

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61402346, 51475347]
  2. International ScienceAMP
  3. Technology Cooperation Program of China [2015DFA70340]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WUT: 2017III015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The allocation of spectrum resources efficiently and equitably in dynamic cognitive vehicular networks is more challenging than static cognitive networks. Currently, most spectrum allocation algorithms are on the basis of a fixed network topology, thereby ignoring the mobility of cognitive vehicular users (CVUs), timeliness of licensed channels, and uncertainty of spectrum sensing in complex environments. In this paper, a cognitive vehicular network spectrum allocation model for maximizing the network throughput and fairness is established considering these factors. A rapid convergence, improved performance algorithm for solving this multi-objective problem is necessary to adapt to a dynamic network environment. Therefore, an improved decomposition-based multi-objective cuckoo search (MOICS/D) algorithm is proposed. This algorithm integrates a decomposition-based multi-objective optimization framework and an improved CS algorithm. The multi-objective problem is decomposed into multiple scalar sub-problems with different weight coefficients, and the cuckoo algorithm with adaptive steps is used to optimize these sub-problems simultaneously. Simulation results show that the MOICS/D algorithm has faster and more stable convergence than the MOEA/D and NSGA-II algorithms and can improve the throughput and fairness of the network. (c) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据