4.6 Article

Substance P in the Corneal Stroma Regulates the Severity of Herpetic Stromal Keratitis Lesions

期刊

INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE
卷 52, 期 12, 页码 8604-8613

出版社

ASSOC RESEARCH VISION OPHTHALMOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-8089

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Eye Institutes [EY020625]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE. To determine whether substance P (SP) in herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV-1) infected cornea regulates the severity of herpetic stromal keratitis (HSK) lesions in a mouse model. METHODS. C57BL/6 mice were infected ocularly with HSV-1 (RE). The corneas with HSK lesions, on Day 15 postinfection, were grouped on the basis of the corneal opacity as mild (<= 2) or severe (>2). The amount of SP was determined in the corneas with mild or severe HSK lesions by enzyme immunosorbent assay (EIA) and confocal microscopy. Subconjunctival inoculation of spantide I, SP receptor antagonist, was carried out during the clinical phase of HSK. ELISA and flow cytometry were used to determine the level of cytokines, chemokines, and influx of immune cell types in the corneal lesions. RESULTS. The authors determined a significantly higher level of SP in the corneas with severe HSK lesions in comparison with mild lesions. The corneas with a higher level of SP also exhibited higher amounts of proinflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IFN-gamma) and chemokines (CCL3, CXCL2) when compared with the corneas with a lower level of SP. SP receptor NK1R expression was determined in CD45- and CD45+ cells in infected cornea. SP present in the corneal stroma of the eyes with severe HSK lesions colocalized with beta-III tubulin(+) and IA(b+) cell types. Subconjunctival inoculation of spantide I during the clinical phase of HSK resulted in significant reduction in the corneal opacity and angiogenesis. CONCLUSIONS. Collectively, these results demonstrate the relative contribution of substance P in regulating the clinical severity of HSK lesions in a mouse model. (Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:8604-8613) DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-8089

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据