4.7 Article

Nonlinear optical performance of few-layer molybdenum diselenide as a slow-saturable absorber

期刊

PHOTONICS RESEARCH
卷 6, 期 7, 页码 674-680

出版社

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/PRJ.6.000674

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [12/IA/1306]
  2. Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) (ISLA) [287732]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [61522510, 61675217, 11704261, 11575118]
  4. Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) [XDB16030700]
  5. Key Research Program of Frontier Science of Chinese Academy of Sciences [QYZDB-SSW-JSC041]
  6. Program of Shanghai Academic Research Leader [17XD1403900]
  7. Shenzhen Key Lab Fund [ZDSYS 20170228105421966]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides are considered promising materials for next-generation photonics and nano-optical devices. Although many previous reports have shown saturable absorption of molybdenum diselenide (MoSe2), these nonlinear optical (NLO) properties of MoSe2 were measured in separate works and under different conditions with their hot-carrier relaxations. Here, we conducted a series of coherent studies on the NLO properties of few-layer MoSe2 via open-aperture Z-scan and degenerate pump-probe techniques. These measurements were taken to test the materials' capabilities as a slow-saturable absorber. A slow-absorber model was employed to analyze the NLO measurements, and the results show that the NLO modulation depth was modeled to be 7.4% and 15.1% for the linear absorption coefficients of 5.22 cm(-1) and 6.51 cm-1, respectively. The corresponding saturated intensities were modeled to be 39.37 MW/cm(2) and 234.75 MW/cm(2), respectively. The excitation carrier recovery time of few-layer MoSe2 was measured by degenerate pump-probe techniques to be similar to 220 ps. These nonlinear optical performances make it a promising slow-saturable absorber for passive mode locking in femtosecond lasers. (C) 2018 Chinese Laser Press

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据