4.7 Article

Adipocyte Xbp1s overexpression drives uridine production and reduces obesity

期刊

MOLECULAR METABOLISM
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 1-17

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molmet.2018.02.013

关键词

Obesity; Xbp1; ER stress; UPR; Pyrimidine; Uridine; CAD

资金

  1. American Diabetes Association [7-08-MN-53]
  2. American Heart Association [14SDG18440002, 14SFRN20510023, 14SFRN20670003]
  3. NIH [R01-DK55758, R01-DK099110, P01-AG051459, P01-DK088761]
  4. Novo Nordisk Research Foundation
  5. National Institutes of Health [HL-120732, HL-128215, HL-126012]
  6. Fondation Leducq [11CVD04]
  7. Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas [RP110486P3]
  8. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R01DK099110, K99DK114498, P01DK088761] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  9. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [P01AG051459] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The spliced transcription factor Xbp1 (Xbp1s), a transducer of the unfolded protein response (UPR), regulates lipolysis. Lipolysis is stimulated by fasting when uridine synthesis is also activated in adipocytes. Methods: Here we have examined the regulatory role Xbp1s in stimulation of uridine biosynthesis in adipocytes and triglyceride mobilization using inducible mouse models. R esults: Xbp1s is a key molecule involved in adipocyte uridine biosynthesis and release by activation of carbamoyl-phosphate synthetase 2, aspartate transcarbamylase, dihydroorotase (CAD), the rate-limiting enzyme for UMP biosynthesis. Adipocyte Xbp1s overexpression drives energy mobilization and protects mice from obesity through activation of the pyrimidine biosynthesis pathway. Conclusion: These observations reveal that Xbp1s is a potent stimulator of uridine production in adipocytes, enhancing lipolysis and invoking a potential anti-obesity strategy through the induction of a futile biosynthetic cycle. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier GmbH. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据