4.6 Article

Gastric Mesenchymal Myofibroblasts Maintain Stem Cell Activity and Proliferation of Murine Gastric Epithelium in Vitro

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 185, 期 3, 页码 798-807

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.11.007

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [26460945]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26460945] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stem cells are influenced by a microenvironmental niche that includes mesenchymal cells. We established a novel Long-term method for primary mouse glandular stomach culture with mesenchymal myofibroblasts to investigate gastric epithelial-mesenchymal interactions. A gastric mesenchymat myofibroblast (GMF) cell Line was established from mouse glandular stomach. Glandular stomach cells from neonatal mice and GMF cells were co-cultured in a collagen get. Cultured stomach cells yielded expanding sphere-Like structures. In the GMF co-culture system, the number and size of gastrospheres were increased compared with control cultures (P = 0.009 and 0.008, respectively). Immunohistochemistry showed cells positive for human gastric mucin, HIK1083, and chromogranin A, indicating differentiation into surface mucous cells, mucous neck cells, and enteroendocrine cells, respectively. RNA in situ hybridization for Lgr5 showed Lgr5(+) stem cells in the cultured gastrospheres. Lgr5(+) cells were observed persistently in the epithelium of gastrospheres in the GMF co-culture system for 2 months. GM Fs allowed the cultured gastric epithelium to maintain active proliferation similar to that seen in vivo. Real-time quantitative RT-PCR showed that Gas1 expression was higher in GMFs (P = 0.0445), and Hoxc8, Notch1, and Sox10 expressions were higher in intestinal mesenchymal myofibroblasts (P = 0.0003, 0.0143, and 0.0488, respectively). We show the potential role of GMFs in sustaining Lgr5(+) stem cell activity and affecting normal gastric epithelial differentiation and proliferation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据