4.5 Article

Effect of stacking angles on mechanical properties and damage propagation of plain woven carbon fiber laminates

期刊

MATERIALS RESEARCH EXPRESS
卷 5, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/aab332

关键词

woven carbon fiber laminates; damage propagation; different stacking angles; mechanical property

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51375201, 51775227]
  2. China National New Energy Vehicle Pilot Project [2016YFB0101601]
  3. Jilin Province Science and Technology Development Projects [20170101130JC]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Damage propagation induced failure is a predominant damage mechanism. This study is aimed at assessing the damage state and damage propagation induced failure with different stacking angles, of woven carbon fiber/epoxy laminates subjected to quasi-static tensile and bending load. Different stages of damage processing and damage behavior under the bending load are investigated by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). The woven carbon fiber/epoxy laminates which are stacked at six different angles (0 degrees, 15 degrees, 30 degrees, 45 degrees, 60 degrees, 75 degrees) with eight plies have been analyzed: [0](8), [15](8), [30](8), [45](8), [60](8), [75](8). Three-point bending test and quasi-static tensile test are used in validating the woven carbon fiber/epoxy laminates' mechanical properties. Furthermore, the damage propagation and failure modes observed under flexural loading is correlated with flexural force and load-displacement behaviour respectively for the laminates. The experimental results have indicated that [45](8) laminate exhibits the best flexural performance in terms of energy absorption duo to its pseudo-ductile behaviour but the tensile strength and flexural strength drastically decreased compared to [0](8) laminate. Finally, SEM micrographs of specimens and fracture surfaces are used to reveal the different types of damage of the laminates with different stacking angles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据