4.5 Article

Subtype C ALVAC-HIV and bivalent subtype C gp120/MF59 HIV-1 vaccine in low-risk, HIV-uninfected, South African adults: a phase 1/2 trial

期刊

LANCET HIV
卷 5, 期 7, 页码 E366-E378

出版社

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3018(18)30071-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
  2. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
  3. NIAID US Public Health Service [UM1 AI068614, UM1 AI068618, UM1 AI068635, UM1 AI069453, UM1 AI069519, UM1 AI069469, UM1 AI069422]
  4. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1110792, OPP1017604]
  5. GlaxoSmithKline
  6. NIAID [HHSN272201300033C//HHSN272201600012C]
  7. NIAID
  8. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1017604, OPP1110792] Funding Source: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Modest efficacy was reported for the HIV vaccine tested in the RV144 trial, which comprised a canarypox vector (ALVAC) and envelope (env) glycoprotein (gp120). These vaccine components were adapted to express HIV-1 antigens from strains circulating in South Africa, and the adjuvant was changed to increase immunogenicity. Furthermore, 12-month immunisation was added to improve durability. In the HIV Vaccine Trials Network (HVTN) 100 trial, we aimed to assess this new regionally adapted regimen for advancement to efficacy testing. Methods HVTN 100 is a phase 1/2, randomised controlled, double-blind trial at six community research sites in South Africa. We randomly allocated adults (aged 18-40 years) without HIV infection and at low risk of HIV infection to either the vaccine regimen (intramuscular injection of ALVAC-HIV vector [vCP2438] at 0, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months plus bivalent subtype C gp120 and MF59 adjuvant at 3, 6, and 12 months) or placebo, in a 5: 1 ratio. Randomisation was done by computer-generated list. Participants, investigators, and those assessing outcomes were masked to random assignments. Primary outcomes included safety and immune responses associated with correlates of HIV risk in RV144, 2 weeks after vaccination at 6 months (month 6.5). We compared per-protocol participants (ie, those who completed the first four vaccinations and provided samples at month 6.5) from HVTN 100 with stored RV144 samples assayed contemporaneously. This trial is registered with the South African National Clinical Trials Registry (DOH-27-0215-4796) and ClinicalTrials. gov (NCT02404311). Findings Between Feb 9, 2015, and May 26, 2015, 252 participants were enrolled, of whom 210 were assigned vaccine and 42 placebo. 222 participants were included in the per-protocol analysis (185 vaccine and 37 placebo). 185 (100%) vaccine recipients developed IgG binding antibodies to all three vaccine-matched gp120 antigens with significantly higher titres (3.6-8.8 fold; all p<0.0001) than the corresponding vaccine-matched responses of RV144. The CD4+ T-cell response to the ZM96. C env protein in HVTN 100 was 56.4% (n=102 responders), compared with a response of 41.4% (n=79 responders) to 92TH023. AE in RV144 (p=0.0050). The IgG response to the 1086.C variable loops 1 and 2 (V1V2) env antigen in HVTN 100 was 70.5% (95% CI 63.5-76.6; n=129 responders), lower than the response to V1V2 in RV144 (99.0%, 95% CI 96.4-99.7; n=199 responders). Interpretation Although the IgG response to the HVTN 100 vaccine was lower than that reported in RV144, it exceeded the predicted 63% threshold needed for 50% vaccine efficacy using a V1V2 correlate of protection model. Thus, the subtype C HIV vaccine regimen qualified for phase 2b/3 efficacy testing, a critical next step of vaccine development. Copyright (C) 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据