4.5 Article

Association Between Type 2 Diabetes and All-Cause Hospitalization and Mortality in the UK General Heart Failure Population

期刊

JACC-HEART FAILURE
卷 6, 期 1, 页码 18-26

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2017.08.020

关键词

comorbidity; death; diabetes mellitus; heart failure; hospitalization; prognosis

资金

  1. National Institute for Health Research (United Kingdom) Doctoral Fellowship [NIHR-DRF-2012-05-288]
  2. Amgen
  3. AstraZeneca
  4. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  5. Eli Lilly
  6. Novartis
  7. Roche
  8. Servier
  9. Sanofi
  10. Merck Sharp Dohme Ltd.
  11. Novo Nordisk
  12. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [DRF-2012-05-288] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)
  13. National Institute for Health Research [DRF-2012-05-288] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES This study sought to investigate in the general heart failure (HF) population, whether the associations between type 2 diabetes (T2D) and risk of hospitalization and death, are modified by changing glycemic or drug treatment intensity. BACKGROUND In the general HF population, T2D confers a higher risk of poor outcomes, but whether this risk is modified by the diabetes status is unknown. METHODS A nested case-control study in an incident HF database cohort (2002 to 2014) compared patients with T2D with those without for risk of all-cause first hospitalization and death. T2D was stratified by categories of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) or drug treatments measured 6 months before hospitalization and 1 year before death and compared with the HF group without T2D. RESULTS In HF, T2D was associated with risk of first hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.24 to 1.34) and mortality (aOR: 1.24; 95% CI: 1.29 to 1.40). Stratification of T2D by HbA1c levels, compared with the reference HF group without T2D, showed U-shaped associations with both outcomes. Highest risk categories were HbA1c > 9.5% (hospitalization, aOR: 1.75; 95% CI: 1.52 to 2.02; mortality, aOR: 1.30; 95% CI: 1.24 to 1.47) and < 5.5% (hospitalization, aOR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.12 to 1.80; mortality, aOR: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.10 to 1.51, respectively). T2D group with change in HbA1c of > 1% decrease was associated with hospitalization (aOR: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.18 to 1.49) and mortality (aOR: 1.36; 95% CI: 1.24 to 1.48). T2D drug group associations with hospitalization were no medication (aOR: 1.12; 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.19), oral antihyperglycemic only (aOR: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.27 to 1.41), oral antihyperglycemicthorninsulin (aOR: 1.36; 95% CI: 1.21 to 1.52), and insulin only (aOR: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.43 to 1.81); and with mortality for the same drug groups were 1.31 (95% CI: 1.23 to 1.39), 1.16 (95% CI: 1.11 to 1.22), 1.19 (95% CI: 1.06 to 1.34), and 1.43 (95% CI: 1.31 to 1.57), respectively. The T2D group with reduced drug treatments were associated with hospitalization (aOR: 2.13; 95% CI: 1.68 to 2.69) and mortality (aOR: 2.09; 95% CI: 1.81 to 2.41). CONCLUSIONS In the general HF population, T2D stratified by glycemic control and drug treatments showed differential risk associations. Routine measures of dynamic diabetes status provide important prognostic indication of poor outcomes in HF. Crown Copyright (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier on behalf of the American College of Cardiology Foundation. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据