4.2 Article

Investigation of the multiplet features of SrTiO3 in X-ray absorption spectra based on configuration interaction calculations

期刊

JOURNAL OF SYNCHROTRON RADIATION
卷 25, 期 -, 页码 777-784

出版社

INT UNION CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
DOI: 10.1107/S160057751800423X

关键词

soft X-ray absorption; configuration interaction cluster calculation; 3d transition metal oxide; crystal field effect

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11704317, U1332105]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M602064]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities [20720160020]
  4. Center for Functional Nanomaterials, US DOE Office of Science Facility, at Brookhaven National Laboratory [DE-SC00127041]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Synchrotron-based L-2,L-3-edge absorption spectra show strong sensitivities to the local electronic structure and chemical environment. However, detailed physical information cannot be extracted easily without computational aids. Here, using the experimental Ti L-2,L-3-edges absorption spectrum of SrTiO3 as a fingerprint and considering full multiplet effects, calculations yield different energy parameters characterizing local ground state properties. The peak splitting and intensity ratios of the L-3 and L-2 set of peaks are carefully analyzed quantitatively, giving rise to a small hybridization energy around 1.2 eV, and the different hybridization energy values reported in the literature are further addressed. Finally, absorption spectra with different linearly polarized photons under various tetragonal crystal fields are investigated, revealing a non-linear orbital-lattice interaction, and a theoretical guidance for material engineering of SrTiO3-based thin films and heterostructures is offered. Detailed analysis of spectrum shifts with different tetragonal crystal fields suggests that the eg crystal field splitting is a necessary parameter for a thorough analysis of the spectra, even though it is not relevant for the ground state properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据