4.7 Article

Curve Query Processing in Wireless Sensor Networks

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY
卷 64, 期 11, 页码 5198-5209

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2014.2375330

关键词

Curve query processing; sensed curve; wireless sensor networks (WSNs)

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2012CB316200]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61190115, 61370217]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [HIT.KISTP201415]
  4. U.S. National Science Foundation [CNS-1152001, CNS-1252292]
  5. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20132302120045]
  6. Natural Scientific Research Innovation Foundation in Harbin Institute of Technology [HIT.NSRIF.2014070]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most existing query processing algorithms for wireless sensor networks (WSNs) can only deal with discrete values. However, since the monitored environment always changes continuously with time, discrete values cannot describe the environment accurately and, hence, may not satisfy a variety of query requirements, such as the queries of the maximal, minimal, and inflection points. It is, therefore, of great interest to introduce new queries capable of processing time-continuous data. This paper investigates curve query processing for WSNs as curve is an effective way to represent continuous sensed data. Specifically, a sensed curve derivation algorithm to support curve query processing in WSNs is first proposed. Then, the aggregation operation is employed as an example to illustrate curve query processing. The corresponding accurate and approximate aggregation algorithms are devised accordingly. We demonstrate that the energy cost of the approximate aggregation algorithm is optimal, provided that the required precision is satisfied. The theoretical analysis and experimental results indicate that the proposed algorithms can achieve high performance in terms of accuracy and energy efficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据