4.6 Article

Subfoveal Choroidal Thickness in Relation to Sex and Axial Length in 93 Danish University Students

期刊

INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE
卷 52, 期 11, 页码 8438-8441

出版社

ASSOC RESEARCH VISION OPHTHALMOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-8108

关键词

-

资金

  1. Bagenkop-Nielsen Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE. To investigate the association between subfoveal choroidal thickness and ocular axial length, refractive error, and blood pressure in healthy young women and men. METHODS. Cross-sectional observational study of 93 eyes in 93 healthy Danish university students (mean age 24.9 +/- 2.6 years). The submacular choroid was imaged using enhanced-depth imaging spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Subfoveal choroidal thickness was measured by visual inspection and manual fitting of the choroidal borderlines. Study parameters included history, best corrected visual acuity, objective refraction, interferometric ocular axial length, fundus photography, and blood pressure manometry. RESULTS. The mean subfoveal choroidal thickness was 342 (+/- 118) mu m, the mean age was 24.9 (+/- 2.6) years and the mean refractive error of participants was -1.43 (+/- 2.9) diopters (D). In a multiple regression model, subfoveal choroidal thickness decreased by 58.2 mu m (95% confidence interval [CI], 42.2-74.2 mu m; P < 0.001) per mm increase in axial length adjusted for age and sex and subfoveal choroidal thickness was 62 mu m (95% CI, 21-104 mu m; P = 0.0039) thicker in men than in women, adjusted for age and axial length. Arterial blood pressure had no statistical effect on subfoveal choroidal thickness. CONCLUSIONS. In this study of healthy young participants choroidal thickness was 18% higher in men than in women when adjusting for age and axial length. This observation may help explain the effect of sex in conditions related to choroidal thickness such as myopia, central serous chorioretinopathy, and age-related macular degeneration. (Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:8438-8441) DOI:10.1167/iovs.11-8108

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据