4.5 Article

Internal protein motions in molecular-dynamics simulations of Bragg and diffuse X-ray scattering

期刊

IUCRJ
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 172-181

出版社

INT UNION CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
DOI: 10.1107/S2052252518000519

关键词

diffuse scattering; protein crystallography; X-ray diffraction; molecular-dynamics simulation; protein conformational ensemble; staphylococcal nuclease; X-ray crystallography; molecular crystals; molecular simulation

资金

  1. US Department of Energy via the Exascale Computing Project
  2. University of California via the Laboratory Fees Research Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Molecular-dynamics (MD) simulations of Bragg and diffuse X-ray scattering provide a means of obtaining experimentally validated models of protein conformational ensembles. This paper shows that compared with a single periodic unit-cell model, the accuracy of simulating diffuse scattering is increased when the crystal is modeled as a periodic supercell consisting of a 2 x 2 x 2 layout of eight unit cells. The MD simulations capture the general dependence of correlations on the separation of atoms. There is substantial agreement between the simulated Bragg reflections and the crystal structure; there are local deviations, however, indicating both the limitation of using a single structure to model disordered regions of the protein and local deviations of the average structure away from the crystal structure. Although it was anticipated that a simulation of longer duration might be required to achieve maximal agreement of the diffuse scattering calculation with the data using the supercell model, only a microsecond is required, the same as for the unit cell. Rigid protein motions only account for a minority fraction of the variation in atom positions from the simulation. The results indicate that protein crystal dynamics may be dominated by internal motions rather than packing interactions, and that MD simulations can be combined with Bragg and diffuse X-ray scattering to model the protein conformational ensemble.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据