期刊
INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 39, 期 2, 页码 385-391出版社
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10792-018-0823-4
关键词
YouTube; Cataract; Phacoemulsification; Small pupil; E-learning; Surgical videos
ObjectiveUsage of YouTube as an educational tool is gaining attention in academic research. To date, there has been no study on the content and quality of eye surgery videos on YouTube. The aim of this study was to analyze YouTube videos on phacoemulsification in eyes with small pupil.MethodsWe searched for the phrases small pupil cataract surgery, small pupil phacoemulsification, small pupil cataract surgery complications, and small pupil phacoemulsification complications in January 2015. Each resulting video was evaluated by all authors, and Krippendorff's alpha was calculated to measure agreement. Videos were classified according to pupil size (small/very small) in the beginning of the surgery, and whether pupillary diameter was large enough to continue surgery safely after pupillary dilation by the surgeon in the video (safe/not safe). Methods of dilatation were also analyzed. Any stated ocular comorbidity or surgical complications were noted.ResultsA total of 96 videos were reviewed. No mechanical intervention for pupillary dilatation was performed in 46 videos. Fifty-eight operated eyes had no stated ocular comorbidity. Ninety-five operations ended successfully without major complication. There was fair agreement between the evaluators regarding pupil sizes (K=0.670) but poor agreement regarding safety (K=0.337).ConclusionsYouTube videos on small pupil phacoemulsification have low complication rates when compared to the literature, although no reliable mechanical dilatation methods are used in almost half of these videos. Until YouTube's place in e-learning becomes clearer, we suggest that viewers be cautious regarding small pupil phacoemulsification videos on YouTube.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据