4.6 Article

Optimal Sizing of Distributed Generations in DC Microgrids With Comprehensive Consideration of System Operation Modes and Operation Targets

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 31129-31140

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2842119

关键词

DC microgrids; optimal sizing; operation modes; battery lifespan prediction; optimization algorithm

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51707045]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the continuous increasing requirement of dc power generations and dc electrical equipment, dc microgrids (MGs) show great natural advantages and development potential. In this paper, aiming at optimal sizing method of distributed generations (DGs) in the dc MGs, the output and capacity of photovoltaic units, wind turbine units, and an energy storage system (ESS) are presented based on the components structures and operation characteristics of the dc MGs. Due to the feature of the dc MGs that demands grid-connected converter (GCC) to exchange power with ac grid, the operating status of GCC and on-grid price are taken into account in the economic objective functions of the dc MGs. Meanwhile, with constraints including battery state of charge, loss of power supply probability (LPSP), renewable energy efficiency (REE), and so on, a particle swarm optimization algorithm is adopted to calculate the optimal sizing results targeting at the lowest annualized capital cost and operation & maintenance (O&M) cost. Furthermore, based on the analysis of the operation schemes of the dc MGs and the dynamic lifespan estimated results of ESS, an optimal sizing approach with comprehensive consideration of system operation modes and operation targets of the dc MGs is proposed. The variation trends of annualized capital cost and O&M cost are investigated under different LPSP and REE. Meanwhile, the system operation schemes are validated by using the obtained results, and the comparison and analysis of the detailed results are conducted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据