4.6 Article

Secure and Robust Digital Image Watermarking Using Coefficient Differencing and Chaotic Encryption

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 19876-19897

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2808172

关键词

Electronic healthcare; Arnold transform; blind watermarking; chaos; DCT; encryption; and robustness

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology (DST), New Delhi through the DST Inspire Fellowship Scheme and Visvesvaraya Ph.D. Scheme
  2. DeitY, Government of India, through the DST Inspire Fellowship Scheme and Visvesvaraya Ph.D. Scheme
  3. Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT), South Korea, under the Information Technology Research Center (ITRC) support program [IITP-2017-2016-0-00312]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a chaotic encryption-based blind digital image watermarking technique applicable to both grayscale and color images. Discrete cosine transform (DCT) is used before embedding the watermark in the host image. The host image is divided into 8 x 8 nonoverlapping blocks prior to DCT application, and the watermark bit is embedded by modifying difference between DCT coefficients of adjacent blocks. Arnold transform is used in addition to chaotic encryption to add double-layer security to the watermark. Three different variants of the proposed algorithm have been tested and analyzed. The simulation results show that the proposed scheme is robust to most of the image processing operations like joint picture expert group compression, sharpening, cropping, and median filtering. To validate the efficiency of the proposed technique, the simulation results are compared with certain state-of-art techniques. The comparison results illustrate that the proposed scheme performs better in terms of robustness, security, and imperceptivity. Given the merits of the proposed scheme, it can be used in applications like e-healthcare and telemedicine to robustly hide electronic health records in medical images.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据