4.6 Article

Fusion of Weighted Mean Reconstruction and SVMCK for Hyperspectral Image Classification

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 15224-15235

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2799079

关键词

Hyperspectral imagery; spatial information; spatial-spectral combined classification; discriminant features

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [41371338]
  2. Central University President Special Base Platform Project [106112017CDJPT120001]
  3. Visiting Scholar Foundation
  4. Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Technology and Systems, Chongqing University, Ministry of Education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Conventional classifiers treat hyperspectral image (HSI) as a list of spectral measurements without considering the spatial relationship between pixels. Therefore, these methods discard the information associated with spatial correlations among distinct pixels in the image, and they are sensitive to the noise pixels in HSI. To address these drawbacks, a spatial-spectral combined classification method termed weighted mean reconstruction-based support vector machine with composite kernels (WMR-SVMCK) is proposed for HSI classification. At first, WMR-SVMCK tries to reconstruct pixels by means of spatial neighbor pixels with reconstruction weights to fuse spatial and spectral information. The reconstructed pixels include the spatial-spectral combined features that enhance the separability of the samples from different classes and reduce the influence of noise pixels in HSI. Then, the proposed method utilizes SVMCK classifier to classify the reconstructed pixels. WMR-SVMCK effectively extracts the discriminating spatial spectral features and enhances the robustness by reconstructing each pixel with spatial neighbor pixels, which significantly improves the classification performance. Experiments on two real hyperspectral data sets (Indian Pines and PaviaU) are performed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed WMR-SVMCK method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据