4.6 Article

A Hybrid Feature Selection Method for Complex Diseases SNPs

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2778268

关键词

Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP); feature selection; hybrid algorithms; complex diseases; machine learning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Machine learning techniques have the potential to revolutionize medical diagnosis. Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) are one of the most important sources of human genome variability; thus, they have been implicated in several human diseases. To separate the affected samples from the normal ones, various techniques have been applied on SNPs. Achieving high classification accuracy in such a high-dimensional space is crucial for successful diagnosis and treatment. In this work, we propose an accurate hybrid feature selection method for detecting the most informative SNPs and selecting an optimal SNP subset. The proposed method is based on the fusion of a filter and a wrapper method, i.e., the Conditional Mutual Information Maximization (CMIM) method and the support vector machinerecursive feature elimination, respectively. The performance of the proposed method was evaluated against four state-of-the-art feature selection methods, minimum redundancy maximum relevancy, fast correlation-based feature selection, CMIM, and ReliefF, using four classifiers, support vector machine, naive Bayes, linear discriminant analysis, and k nearest neighbors on five different SNP data sets obtained from the National Center for Biotechnology Information gene expression omnibus genomics data repository. The experimental results demonstrate the efficiency of the adopted feature selection approach outperforming all of the compared feature selection algorithms and achieving up to 96% classification accuracy for the used data set. In general, from these results we conclude that SNPs of the whole genome can be efficiently employed to distinguish affected individuals with complex diseases from the healthy ones.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据