4.8 Review

eHuman γ-Herpesvirus infection, Tumorigenesis, and immune Control in Mice with Reconstituted Human immune System Components

期刊

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00238

关键词

Epstein-Barr virus; Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus; natural killer cells; T cells; primary effusion lymphoma; lymphoproliferative disease

资金

  1. Cancer Research Switzerland [KFS-4091-02-2017]
  2. SPARKS [15UOZ01]
  3. KFSPMS of the University of Zurich
  4. KFSPHHLD of the University of Zurich
  5. Sobek Foundation
  6. Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Society
  7. Swiss National Science Foundation [310030_162560, CRSII3_160708]
  8. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [CRSII3_160708, 310030_162560] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)
  9. Sparks Charity [15UOZ01] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The human gamma-herpesviruses Epstein-Barr virus (EBV or HHV4) and Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV or HHV8) are each associated with around 2% of all tumors in humans worldwide. However, investigations into their infection, oncogenesis, and immune responses that protect from the associated tumors have been hampered by the exclusive tropism of these pathogens for humans. Mice with reconstituted human immune system components (HIS mice) provide the unique opportunity to study persistent infection, virus associated lymphoma formation, and cell-mediated immune control of EBV and KSHV. Moreover, since these pathogens are unique stimuli for cytotoxic human lymphocyte responses, they also allow us to characterize long-lasting cell-mediated immune control and the requirements for its initiation, which would also be desirable to achieve during antitumor vaccination in general. Thus, human gamma-herpesvirus infection of HIS mice provides unique insights into the biology of these important human pathogens and human cell-mediated immune responses that are considered to be the main protective entity against tumors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据